WEKO3
アイテム
カシュミール問題を考える : 領土と主権の間
https://doi.org/10.15018/00001104
https://doi.org/10.15018/0000110489a8c2fa-d260-4eda-bd4d-7e2245a71010
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2015-03-26 | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
タイトル | カシュミール問題を考える : 領土と主権の間 | |||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
タイトル | ||||||||||
タイトル | The Kashmir issue: Between territory and sovereignty | |||||||||
言語 | en | |||||||||
言語 | ||||||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||||||
資源タイプ | ||||||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
その他 資源タイプ | Article | |||||||||
著者 |
井上, あえか
× 井上, あえか
|
|||||||||
書誌情報 |
ja : アジア太平洋研究 en : Review of Asian and Pacific Studies 巻 39, p. 27-39, 発行日 2014-11 |
|||||||||
出版者 | ||||||||||
出版者 | 成蹊大学アジア太平洋研究センター | |||||||||
言語 | ja | |||||||||
出版タイプ | ||||||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
ISSN | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | 0913-8439 | |||||||||
NCID | ||||||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
収録物識別子 | AN10006940 | |||||||||
アクセス権 | ||||||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
ID登録 | ||||||||||
ID登録 | 10.15018/00001104 | |||||||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
抄録 | ||||||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
内容記述 | The conflict over Kashmir has been a core issue between India and Pakistan since their independence. It is not only just a territorial conflict but also the core issue of the region, which has been changing along with the regional and international environment. In particular, after the 1990's, the people of Kashmir committed to armed resistance, which has become the focus of the risk to regional and international security because both India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Resolution of this problem is quite difficult because it would require committing to the ideas of national integration of both countries. Specifically, for India, it is secularism; for Pakistan, it is the two-nation theory. However, the people of Kashmir want to choose their own destiny—integration with neither India nor Pakistan. India promised Kashmir a degree of freedom and democracy under article 370 of the Indian Constitution; however, for the time being, these right have been curtailed. To resolve this issue, two main plans have been presented by both countries; a referendum and the partition of Kashmir along the Line of Control. But, these ideas disregard the right of self-determination or the nationalist sentiment of the people of Kashmir. Recently a new idea emerged based on the notion of shared sovereignty. The history of discord between India and Pakistan has caused critical anxiety for regional peace and stability. However, there will is hope that a constructive solution to this problem can be found in the future through continuity of dialogue and negotiation between the two countries. We as an international society surrounding these nations, we should maintain a supportive stance for continued cordial dialogue. | |||||||||
言語 | en |